After a year of noise for chiefs who obtain too many calls and preferential treatment of Nfl officials, the week before Super bowl Lix was a real fever pitch around the equity of an officer in the Kansas City matches. Roger Goodell asked several questions on this subject, Current NFL players have suggested The results of the games were rigged, The referees’ union had to publish a declarationAnd it seemed that each chef player was forced to talk about the problem.
In the wake of destruction 40-22 by the chiefs’ eagles on Sunday evening, at least one chef’s player speaks of an officer. Deandre Hopkins, addressing the media after the Super Bowl, wanted to know if the media were going to talk about the “delicate calls” that went against the chiefs of the Super Bowl.
“I saw a lot in the media on the referees, but obviously, what are you going to say now about the referees and us? Are everything going to talk about the referees now?”
My my my How the plates.
Let’s be frank here: that’s not it. Complaining officials after having been the subject of a wand during the entire game is a terrible look. The chiefs did not lose because of the officer in this match, even if it is possible – and perhaps even likely – the officials of this Super Bowl were not going to be a factor to help the chiefs earn.
The long public discussion on chefs and officers probably did not make Kansas City favors. But let’s not be mistaken: the Eagles beat the pants of the chefs of this game, from start to finish. It was never close and officiating has nothing to do with it.
Kansas City finished with seven penalties for 75 yards and the Eagles finished with eight penalties for 59 yards. The loss of chiefs was their inability to move the ball in attack against an elite Philly defense. Patrick Mahomes launched a terrible pick-six, then launched an even worse interception by the goal line.
The chiefs lost because the Eagles were better and the officials were never a factor in this match.
