The road to Wrestlemania 41 will probably take many twists and turns in the coming months, but the day after WWE Royal Rumble Ple 2025, a major match was planned for the show. CM Punk eliminated the Roman and Seth Rollins Reigns of the Royal Rumble after the couple fought, only for Punk to be also spilled. Rollins gave Reigns a super section before fighting with punk. After that, Punk interrupted the coated body of Reigns and came out despite their existing alliance. The events of the Royal Rumble indicate that Wrestlemania 41 Could present a triple star threat match between these three men, since it seems likely that none of them will be taken into account in the plans of one or the other world title for men. However, this reservation decision is a mistake, and there are several reasons why.
Any combination of a single match between novel Reigns, CM Punk and Seth Rollins would be better
A match in Triple threat to Wrestlemania 41 is not as intriguing
- Roman Reigns and Seth Rollins never had a simple Wrestlemania match.
- CM Punk and Rollins could have waited for Wrestlemania.
- Roman Reigns against CM Punk is a successful match
Triple threat matches can be fun and wear a quick pace, but when it comes to Wrestlemania, the show was built forever on blockbuster matches (see Hogan against Andre, Rock against Austin, Reigns vs Rhodes), which Always more important than multi-men. This is a great reason to know why any combination of matches by simple involving these three individuals would be much better for the Wrestlemania 41 card. For example, Roman Reigns vs cm punk is a major match between two huge fresh and exciting stars, CM PUNK Against Seth Rollins is a continuation of a long and personal rivalry that would allow the pair to have a better confrontation than they made during the first of Netflix de Raw, and Roman Reigns against Seth Rollins is a simple match So many years in the manufacture which has never honored the scene of Wrestlemania.
Related
Why Jey USO was the only logical choice as winner of Royal Rumble
Most fans saw Jey Uso win the Royal Rumble as a major surprise, but WWE was ready to take a risk on “the main event”.
There are a lot of great stories to tell, and the game of singles that resulted would probably be much better in quality, in narration and in investment in the crowd than a triple threat. With these three stories involved and all the stories intertwined, there is a good chance that the narration becomes disorderly and disjointed, while concentrating clearly on a single quarrel at the same time would allow things to take place in a much more logical way And interesting and have so many more narrative elements involved.
A triple threat without challenges is difficult to sell for Wrestlemania
Roman Reigns vs. Seth Rollins vs. cm punk could be messy
- The construction of this triple threat could end up being convoluted.
- Randy Orton against Cody Rhodes against Ted Dibiase Jr. took place in Wrestlemania 26.
- It is not common for triple threats to resentments to occur in Wrestlemania.
Triple threatening matches almost always occur exclusively when there is something on the line, rather than adjusting resentments. For example, it is when there are two challenges that cannot be separated, both for a world title, or a triple threat to determine a number one candidate. In Wrestlemania, the only examples of a triple non -title threat or zero issues came to Wrestlemania 26, when Randy Orton faced Cody Rhodes and Ted Dibiase in a fairly bland match.
Related
Could a heel turn be what Sami Zayn needs to be a WWE world champion?
Sami Zayn has never been world champion in WWE, but an intriguing development with Kevin Owens gives her his best shot.
It is difficult to sell a match in Triple threat between three men, the winner only earns damage duties, especially when the result has an asterisk next to it. Whoever is pinned will not really have “loss”. The resulting impact leaves an unsatisfactory taste in your mouth – something you don’t want in a Wrestlemania, which is supposed to be an event that sees final winners and the end of the quarrels. It will be difficult to please fans with this match, whatever the result.
Drew McIntyre will miss a great Wrestlemania match
The triple threat means a less major place
- Drew McIntyre could face Roman Reigns in Wrestlemania.
- WWE sacrifices Drew McIntyre in a bland match with Damian Priest.
- Other wrestlers, such as Jacob Fatu, could also have been shed light on to Wrestlemania.
One of the main reasons why this triple threat match is a mistake is due to the ramifications it has in the rest of the card – especially for Drew McIntyre. After an exciting 2024, McIntyre has cemented as one of the best global WWE wrestlers today, but it seems that it is intended for a match with Damian Priest. It will certainly be a good match, but it is not good enough for McIntyre, which, according to the Daily mail was not too satisfied with these plans.
Related
Knight’s career may have already reached a WWE summit
The Knight is one of the most popular WWE stars, but fans may have to accept the harsh reality that he has already culminated with the promotion.
If the WWE went with a punk against Rollins, then McIntyre could have had a marquee match with Reigns – a WWE match still built actively. In addition, McIntyre could well have been a good opponent for Cody Rhodes, although with the way the Royal Rumble has been updated, there is no place for McIntyre in the scene of the world title either, and with this Triple threat match being a strong possibility, she leaves McIntyre lost. There are others who could also miss large spots, because Jacob Fatu faces Reigns would also have been great. Of course, the triple threat match may not even occur, and WWE can have rear plans for their best stars in the living room, but if triple H takes this path, it will be a mistake and will cause more problems than it Do not solve it.
